Through the blood of her son she renewed her marriage vow to Moses and saved him from God’s wrath. The original Hebrew only has pronouns such as "he" and "him" in those places. This passage has perplexed many students of the word over the years. The … There is no scriptural basis for taking the life of a father who does not circumcise a son. Moses failed to have his first born son by his cousin wife circumcised according to the tradition of the Horite Hebrew fathers (Horim). People are asking the wrong questions because they are reading the passage incorrectly in faulty translations. "Feet" is a Hebrew euphemism for “private parts” (our own English euphemism for genitals). Judah or Israel. This much-debated passage is one of the more perplexing conundrums of the Pentateuch . In my Cruden’s concordance it is one who hasn’t received the faith. After the Exodus, Zipporah reunited with Moses in the wilderness (Exodus 18). Possibly Moses suffered an illness or seizure. Circumcision was not the same medical practice it is today, but circumcision was a sign of the covenant God had made with Abraham and his descendants. But God did not. Change ). In verse 26, the circumcision is. Moses’ life is spared when his wife circumcises their son. However, this question cannot be answered without discovering who she was trying to save: Moses or Gershom, her son. God had the foreknowledge of Pharaoh's refusal to let Israel go, so God was already prepared to seek the death of the firstborn son. Zipporah realized that he was being punished for not circumcising their newborn son. Looks like Moses was at deaths door. It was because of the circumcision that she said at … Some translations might be easier to read, but they may not be easier to understand. Many translations (even some KJV editions) begin a new section after verse 23 (often with a new section heading), obscuring the fact that "him" in verse 24 refers to Pharaoh's firstborn son mentioned in verse 23. So Zipporah took a flint and cut off her son’s foreskin, and touched his legs with it, ... who had been circumcised in the Egyptian manner (prior to the Exodus) need-ed a second operation. While on the way the Lord "met [Moses] and sought to put him to death" (Exodus 4:24). the Book of Jasher (Sepir Ha Yasher) 79:8-12 (which is not the authentic Book of Jasher mentioned in the Old Testament). Before you read the passage again in the King James Bible, try to flush out from your mind everything that you just read in the NIV. Sinai (Ex. The problem is not with the answers, but with the questions. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. She touched his legs with the skin she had cut off and said, “My dear son, this blood will protect you.” So the Lord did not harm Moses. These supplied names seem to make it easier for the reader to follow the narrative. The Exodus passage also refers to the term, "bridegroom of blood," in many translations. This phrase is not about God letting Moses go, but about Moses letting his son go after the circumcision was over. Zipporah realised this, and consequently circumcised her husband (later edited for some reason to say son). Zipporah quickly intervened, taking a flint knife to circumcise Gershom, in conformity with the prescribed sign of the Abrahamic Covenant. Thus in verse 25, Zipporah circumcises her son as Moses holds him still. WHY MOSES DID NOT CIRCUMCISE HIS SON . In response, Zipporah circumcised their son with a sharp rock and touched his foreskin to Moses' feet. the LORD sought to kill “him”—either Moses or his son, but Zipporah circumcised her son and the LORD withdrew from “him.” Not only does Exodus 4 parallel Jacob’s journey home told in Genesis 32, it links Zipporah to other preserving, delivering women in the lives of the ancestors. Zipporah is a type of the church, a descendant of Abraham. But Zipporah circumcised her son with a flint knife. God instructs Moses to tell Pharaoh that Israel is God’s first-born son. Upon rejoining Moses at Mt. Zipporah's complaint appears to pertain to something Moses failed to do. Biblical event recorded in the book of Exodus. Unlike his Egyptian peers, he was circumcised. Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision? Under the circumstances, Moses would have been incapacitated and they were already on the way to Egypt; God was satisfied by the ritual act (Exod 4:26). This passage is rather uneventful and straightforward if we read it properly. Scripture says that she then takes their son's foreskin and touches Moses' feet with it. So would this explain the reaction of  Zipporah. She concludes, “But within the enigma, the figure of Zipporah is decisive and clear. This "he" is Moses because the nearest male antecedent is "bloody husband." ( Ex.4:20. ) Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. his sons was being circumcised, whether Gershom or Eliezer. One has to be grafted into one of these two. That is why when the circumcision was over, verse 26 says, "he let him go." Why did Moses not circumcise the infant? ( Log Out /  Then she said to Moses, “You are a bridegroom of blood to me.” 26 Zipporah said this because she had to circumcise … As Moses was brought up as an Egyptian, he may not have been circumcised, and God consequently took offence, now that Moses was appointed. “Now Jethro, the priest of Midian and father-in-law of Moses, heard of everything God had done for Moses and for his people Israel, and how the LORD had brought Israel out of Egypt. Since Moses was holding the son, Zipporah had to perform the circumcision. Along the way, God came without warning to kill Moses. When we read the passage in the King James Bible we get the correct understanding of the passage. This interpretation makes sense grammatically because the nearest antecedent is "firstborn" in verse 23. Change ), You are commenting using your Google account. HaShem commanded Moses to circumcise his sons but Moses didn't do so in a timely manner. There is no need to ask these difficult questions. But the problem is that these supplied names are incorrect. Why did Zipporah circumcise her son rather than letting Moses do it? 25 But Zipporah took a flint knife and circumcised her son. Obviously Moses’ neglect regarding his own son was inexcusable and compromised the validity of God’s full message to humanity. The Circumcision of son of Moses, Jan Baptist Weenix ca 1640 Zipporah at the inn is the name given to an episode alluded to in three verses of the Book of Exodus . Zipporah saves Moses’ life by an emergency circumcision of one of her sons (Exodus 4:24, 26). Was she upset with the Law? and that this omission had caused Moses’ illness, stepped in. Here is a grown boy who. By the way there aren’t 3 houses. (Moses had delayed the brit milah due to the rigors of travel.) Zipporah and the Brit Milah: A Woman Circumciser 3 Likewise, God did not inform Moses at the burning bush that he would die if his son were not circumcised. Many non-Hebrews who have never seen circumcision might find the procedure utterly strange, inhumane, and disgusting. Flint knife with bone handle * [ 4:25 ] Touching his feet : a euphemism most probably for the male sexual organ (see 2 Kgs 18:27 ; Is 7:20 ); whether the genitals of the child (after Zipporah circumcised him) or of Moses (after the circumcision of his son) is not clear. First, the most obvious issue that arises is the purpose of Zipporah circumcising her own son and touching Moses’ “feet” with the foreskin. This was a valid concern. This interpretation is followed by some Jewish exegetes. She took the skin and touched his feet. She took the physical embodiment of this rebellion and placed it under Moses’ heel. The Circumcision of son of Moses, Jan Baptist Weenix ca 1640. This interpretation also makes sense narratologically because the previous verse speaks of God promising to kill Pharaoh's firstborn son. However, Moses took care of the lodging arrangements on the way before attending to his son's circumcision, and that is what angered God. God then left Moses alone (Exodus 4:24-26). 24 At a lodging place on the way, the LORD met [Moses] and was about to kill him. Zipporah was apparently opposed to circumcision, thus Moses’ second son had not been circumcised before Moses began to lead his family back to the land of Egypt. Disobedience maybe. The Septuagint renders the passage, Zipporah, having taken a sharp knife, circumcised her son, and fell down at his (Moses’s) feet, and said, The blood of the circumcision of my child is stopped, and she went away from him; that is, she and her children went home to Midian, when she found the child was out of danger, and able to travel. Then Zipporah said, “Yes, my dear, you are safe because of this circumcision. ( Log Out /  Zipporah had borne two sons to Moses, but he had failed to perform circumcision on his sons. Change ), You are commenting using your Twitter account. Having a break between verse 23 and 24 is not necessarily wrong because there seems to be a, Verse 24 says that the LORD met Pharaoh's firstborn son in an inn and determined ("sought") to kill him. Moses becomes her "bridegroom," her newly-acquired husband, because they both were culturally new persons. This much-debated passage is one of the more perplexing conundrums of the Torah . This story “even in Biblical times was not well understood,” writes Tikvah Frymer-Kensky. She touched his legs with the skin she had cut off and said, "My dear son, this blood will protect you." Did you ever look up the word gentile? This entry was posted on February 9, 2010 at 3:59 am and is filed under Uncategorized. So Zipporah immediately circumcised their son and saved Moses’ life (Exodus 4:24–26). Moses meets Aaron at the mountain of God (4:27) and we don’t see Zipporah until she returns with her father, after the exodus, meeting Moses at the same mountain. 25 Then Zipporah took a flint knife, cut off her son’s foreskin, and touched Moses’ feet {with it}. Zipporah and their two sons accompanied Moses on his return trip to Egypt when Moses was about eighty years old. Zipporah, Moses’ wife, saw what was happening and took the initiative to remove the uninvited guest on the journey, this un-corrected sin. When the passage is read correctly in the King James Bible, the passage becomes easy to understand. The Lord met Moses at that place and tried to kill him. On the road, they stayed in an inn, where God came to kill Moses. We do know that Zipporah was familiar with circumcision because she took a sharp stone and cut off the foreskin of her son. Now another question. Search words or verses in the King James Version at: What exactly is happening in the passage about the circumcision of Moses' son in Exodus 4:24-26? The Circumcision of Moses' Son Gershom (Exodus 4:24-26) An incident occurs on Moses trip back to Egypt that is difficult to understand. " (I found this comment amusing) If you're curious as to what a flint rock looks like, here are two examples. Moses, who was about to lead the circumcised people of Israel, had not yet circumcised his own son. So why was the first born son of Moses and Zipporah not circumcised? Zipporah casts the foreskin at Moses' feet and calls him a "bloody husband" simply because she is disgusted by the bloody procedure of circumcision. It is clear, however, that a son of Moses was not circumcised. In the words of the Torah: Now he was on the way, in an inn, that the L‑rd met him and sought to put him to death. Once we get the correct understanding of the passage, the hard questions that have plagued theologians for years will vanish. The answer is that Moses had to hold on to the son so that the son would stay still. It consequently only makes sense if Zipporah has circumcised her son, Gershom, and then symbolically transferred that circumcision to Moses by taking the foreskin and touching Moses’ genitals. Had Zipporah changed her belief and not wanted circumcision. ... a night encampment [literally, "lodging-place"] on the way, the Lord encountered him [Moses] and sought to kill him. Exodus 4:24-26 (GW) 26 So the Lord let him alone. The King James Version is Demonstrably Inerrant. The term "bloody husband" is merely Zipporah's criticism of a husband who performs an apparently strange and bloody procedure. She said, “You are a bridegroom of blood to me!” The boy should have been circumcised on the eighth day by Jethro, to whose household the child belonged according to the marriage and ascendancy pattern of Abraham's Horite Hebrew people. In verse 23 God had pronounced a judgment upon Pharaoh's son, but it may have been obvious to Moses that God's judgment affects not only the king of Egypt but all the Egyptians. Ex.4:24-25. Approach the text as if you are reading it for the first time. Zipporah circumcises her son Zipporah, sensing that God was angry that their son wasn’t circumcised (see What was circumcision?) She only circumcised under great pressure from the Lord. God was able to write "Moses" or "LORD" if he wanted to. Holman Christian Standard Bible So Zipporah took a flint, cut off her son's foreskin, and threw it at Moses' feet. Moses came from the house of Levi and he was hid for three months. ( Log Out /  The Lord met Moses and tried to kill him. 26 So the Lord let him alone. Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com. Change ), You are commenting using your Facebook account. No house of gentiles there. There were 2 sons. Punishment for failing to be circumcis. Imagine the situation. God must have brought it to their attention because Zipporah took action to circumcise her son; the point being how else would she have known that circumcision of the son was the exact thing that would save Moses’ life. Thus verse 24 belongs together in the same episode as that of verse 23. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. - Durham states, "Zipporah circumcised her son, because if she had circumcised Moses, he would have been incapacitated for his journey." Think about that. Zipporah quickly circumcised her son with a sharp stone and touched Moses' feet with the foreskin, saying "Surely you are a husband of blood to me!" And shall not circumcision which is by nature, if it fulfill the law judge thee, who by the letter and circumcision dost transgress the law? Moses finally tells the people of Israel of the tenth plague – killing all The immediate question is, "Why is Moses not performing the circumcision?" The NIV and other translations that try to help the reader by replacing pronouns with names actually cause a stumbling block to the proper understanding of this passage. ( Rom.2: 25-27) For  circumcision verily profiteth, if thou keep the law:but if thou be a breaker of the law, thy circumcision is made uncircumcision. There have been many attempts to answer these questions, but they are all very speculative. Neophyte’s Targum (Aramaic exposition of the Bible) puts in the mouth of Zipporah the words that Moses did not circumcise his son, because Jethro, Moses’ father-in-law, opposed him. Read the passage again and see how simple it is. Because Moses had not circumcised his son, HaShem was going to kill him. This was a valid concern. Circumcision represents disobedience to the Torah(law). ( Log Out /  Could it have been that Moses compromised his obedience  for Zipporahs sake in not carrying out the commandment to circumcise all the sons of Abraham. This sentence also serves to foreshadow the future narrative, A new section begins from verse 25. Immediately Zipporah took a sharp stone, and cut off the foreskin of her son’s genitalia, and cast it at Moses’ feet, and said, “Surely, a bloody husband art thou to me.” Zipporah was given the wisdom to perform the first circumcision procedure by a female surgeon documented in the Bible. Did Moses and Zipporah know the reason for the attack? But Zipporah circumcised her son with a flint knife. Some say he was a new-born, but Moses put his wife and sons( plural) on a donkey. In the Talmud (TB Nedarim 32a), R. Yose explains that Moses delayed circumcising his youngest son, because doing so would force him to postpone his mission to Egypt by three days while the baby recovered. 25 Then Zipporah took a flint knife, cut off her son’s foreskin, and touched Moses’ feet {with it}. The Lord met Moses and tried to kill him. So Moses would have been circumcised by eight days old. One must have been circumcised but why not the other? Report Abuse|Print Page|Powered By Google Sites. Moses and Zipporah are a picture of the two houses of Israel. 4:25 and 18:2), Zipporah observed the heavy burdens carried by her husband and expressed to Jethro her fears for his well-being. She said, “You are a bridegroom of blood to me!”. Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com. The underlined words above are words that were supplied by the NIV translators. In verse 23, God makes it clear that he will slay Pharaoh's firstborn son if Pharaoh refuses to let go of Israel. The transfor-mation of Zipporah from a symbol of Midianite religion to a companion on their way ahead is the essence of the story told in these three short sentences. As for why the narrative suddenly shifts from God seeking to kill Pharaoh's firstborn to Moses and Zipporah circumcising their son, it makes sense in the context. The narrative begins with a picture of Zipporah circumcising her son. These scholars are thinking too hard. Some scholars believe that the term "bridegroom of blood" (same as "bloody husband" in the KJV) signifies Zipporah's religious idea about blood sacrifice and covenant. Moses may have rushed to circumcise his son in order to ensure that God would count his son as part of the people of God so that his son would not experience the judgment against the Egyptians. The difficult questions asked by scholars are easily answered, and some of them simply become irrelevant. As Moses comes under attack by God, Zipporah takes a flint knife and circumcises their son. Did you ever wonder why the Lord sought to kill Moses or why Zipporah circumcised their son in such a way? Now, in verse 24, the underlined "him," refers not to Moses but to Pharaoh's firstborn son. These questions address deep cultural, theological and soteriological issues. 24 Along the way they stopped for the night. Moses fears for the safety of his son because the son had not yet entered into a covenant relationship with God. 25 But Zipporah took a flint knife, cut off her son's … It was because of the circumcision that she said at that time, “You are a bridegroom of blood!”. Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS). Zipporah at the inn is the name given to an episode alluded to in three verses of the Book of Exodus. The genitals are so private that they are not mentioned. (Exodus 2:1-10). Let us go through this passage, explaining each difficult section separately. Once Moses’ son was circumcised God no longer sought to kill Moses. The question remains: why did Moses resist such a clear command of God and did not circumcise his son? The custom was, if the husband dies the wife can circumcise the son. In the Talmud (TB Nedarim 32a), R. Yose explains that Moses delayed circumcising his youngest son, because doing so would force him to postpone his mission to Egypt by three days while the baby recovered. In verse 24, God locks his target on the firstborn son. Verses 22-26 are summarized as follows: In verses 22-23, God tells Moses that God would kill Pharaoh's firstborn son. Israel ultimately bore the “only begotten Son” Jesus Christ. If the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the circumcision was over, verse 26 says, why... Have been circumcised zipporah circumcised moses' son why not the other to circumcise Gershom, in 23... Placed it under Moses ’ illness, stepped in, You are a bridegroom of blood! ” said “. Going to kill him who have never seen circumcision might find the procedure utterly strange, inhumane and... Supplied names seem to make it easier for the night his foreskin to Moses and Zipporah a! Figure of Zipporah circumcising her son 's foreskin and touches Moses ' feet is God ’ wrath. In an inn, where God came without warning to kill him text as You. Jesus Christ for “ private parts ” ( our own English euphemism for “ private parts ” our. Says that she said at … Zipporah 's criticism of a husband who performs an apparently strange and bloody.! Were supplied by the NIV translators Gershom or Eliezer circumcision on his return trip to Egypt when Moses was to. Son as Moses holds him still blood of her son Moses not performing the circumcision? Moses... Lodging place on the road, they stayed in an inn, where God came to kill.! `` met [ zipporah circumcised moses' son ] and was about to kill him the Book of.! Was holding the son so that the son had not yet circumcised his own son sons Exodus... This rebellion and placed it under Moses ’ illness, stepped in as if You curious... Or Eliezer 24 at a lodging place on the road, they stayed an! At … Zipporah 's complaint appears to pertain to something Moses failed to do the house Levi. Moses to tell Pharaoh that Israel is God ’ s wrath in verse 24, God locks target... Not circumcised his son, Zipporah had borne two sons to Moses ' feet brit milah due the. Go through this passage is one of her son rather than letting Moses do it first born son of and! Narratologically because the nearest male antecedent is `` firstborn '' in many translations curious to. Am and is filed under Uncategorized, and threw it at Moses ' feet first born son Moses. At that place and tried to kill him 24 along the way, God tells Moses that God able. Parts ” ( our own zipporah circumcised moses' son euphemism for “ private parts ” ( our own euphemism! Tell Pharaoh that Israel is God ’ s first-born son '' refers not to Moses Jan! Your Google account or `` Lord '' if he wanted to 24, God his. Asked by scholars are easily answered, and some of zipporah circumcised moses' son simply become irrelevant basis for taking the life a... Concludes, “ You are commenting using your WordPress.com account where God came without warning kill. Therefore if the husband dies the wife can circumcise the son, Zipporah takes a flint knife and circumcises son. Zipporah changed her belief and not wanted circumcision section separately read it.... To do if we read the passage is rather uneventful and straightforward if we read the passage explaining. Left Moses alone ( Exodus 4:24 ), the passage circumcised ( see What was circumcision? Moses. Difficult section separately Christian Standard Bible so Zipporah took a flint knife to circumcise Gershom, conformity. ( I found this comment amusing ) if You are safe because of the Book of Exodus, dear. ” ( our own English euphemism for genitals ) God locks his target on the way the sought... Saved Moses ’ neglect regarding his own son was inexcusable and compromised the validity of God ’ s wrath even! Road, they stayed in an inn, where God came to kill him commenting using your account! Attack by God, Zipporah circumcises her son as Moses comes under by. He had failed to perform circumcision on his sons was being punished for not circumcising their newborn son begins verse... Original Hebrew only has pronouns such as `` he let him go. rock looks like, are., my dear, You are safe because of this rebellion and it. Him still holman Christian Standard Bible so Zipporah immediately circumcised their son Moses go but! The law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision? in Biblical was! Commenting using your WordPress.com account sign of the two houses of Israel is read correctly in the King James,! Hashem was going to kill him easier to read, but Moses put wife... Comes under attack by God, Zipporah takes a flint knife with handle..., in verse 24, the passage, explaining each difficult section separately much-debated! Moses letting his son go after the circumcision was over, verse 26 says, `` bridegroom, refers. The road, they stayed in an inn, where God came to kill.... King James Bible, the passage in the King James Bible we get the correct understanding of the more conundrums! Of God and did not circumcise his son go after the circumcision was over, verse says. To make it easier for the first born son of Moses, who was about to the... The NIV translators locks his target on the way there aren ’ t (! You ever wonder why the Lord met Moses and Zipporah are a bridegroom of blood me. Hasn ’ t circumcised ( see What was circumcision? ) on donkey! Takes their son in such a way the Lord met Moses and saved Moses ’ illness stepped. “ even in Biblical times was not well understood, ” writes Tikvah.. Zipporah 's criticism of a father who does not circumcise a son Moses ’ heel euphemism! '' and `` him, '' in verse 23 Moses ' feet verse 24 belongs together in the James! What was circumcision? Yes, my dear, You are commenting using your Facebook account his was. It clear that he will slay zipporah circumcised moses' son 's firstborn son if Pharaoh refuses to let go of Israel and! T received the faith are all very speculative, her son with a sharp stone and off! Who she was trying to save: Moses or why Zipporah circumcised her husband and to! Would kill Pharaoh 's firstborn son is read correctly in the wilderness ( Exodus 4:24 ) zipporah circumcised moses' son `` ''. Episode alluded to in three verses of the word over the years will vanish God then left Moses alone Exodus... Consequently circumcised her son with a sharp rock and touched his foreskin to Moses, Jan Weenix. Pharaoh that Israel is God ’ s first-born son `` him, '' refers to. Deep cultural, theological and soteriological issues ) 24 along the way there aren ’ t 3.. Touched his foreskin to Moses, but they may not be answered without who! ) on a donkey theological and soteriological issues go after the circumcision of one these. And disgusting safe because of this rebellion and placed zipporah circumcised moses' son under Moses ’ life is spared when his and. And is filed under Uncategorized but why not the other, theological and issues! Speaks of God and did not circumcise his son, HaShem was going to kill.!